The process of selecting a board can seem opaque from the outside. Who decides who sits on these governing bodies? What qualifies someone? And what obligations do they take on when they accept?
The answer varies significantly depending on the type of organisation — and understanding the difference matters, both for organisations looking to build effective boards and for individuals considering whether to put their hand up.
Publicly Traded Companies
In publicly traded companies, directors are elected by shareholders — typically at an Annual General Meeting. The company’s constitution specifies who is eligible to stand for election, the length of terms, and the voting procedure.
Directors of public companies carry significant legal obligations under the Corporations Act 2001, and their performance is publicly visible. Shareholders can vote to remove directors who aren’t performing. This accountability mechanism doesn’t exist in the same way for private or not-for-profit boards, which makes the selection process even more important in those contexts.
Private Companies
The board of a private company typically oversees its own composition, with the founders and existing directors having significant control over who joins. In early-stage companies, the founders often constitute the entire board initially, adding external directors as the company’s needs evolve.
For private companies, board members are chosen primarily for their ability to add value — industry expertise, networks, specific technical knowledge, or the experience of having built and sold similar businesses. Early board relationships often begin informally, with directors tested in an advisory capacity before being formally appointed.
The founders’ initial constitution and shareholders’ agreement establish the rules for board composition, voting rights, and director appointment and removal. These documents are worth careful attention, because the governance structures established at founding are very difficult to change once investors and other stakeholders are involved.
Not-for-Profits and Incorporated Associations
For Australian not-for-profits and incorporated associations, board composition is governed by the organisation’s constitution. Most constitutions specify the minimum and maximum number of directors, eligibility requirements, term lengths, and the process for election (usually by members at an AGM or by the board itself to fill casual vacancies).
Where a private company prioritises revenue-generating capabilities in its directors, a not-for-profit looks for alignment with its mission and the skills needed to fulfil it. Legal and financial expertise is typically essential; so is community credibility and knowledge of the stakeholder groups the organisation serves.
Not-for-profit board positions in Australia are almost always voluntary. This affects the candidate pool — and means the organisation needs to make the role genuinely worthwhile, which starts with running meetings that are well-organised and productive rather than a time burden that skilled people can’t justify.
Chosen for a board? Process PA means you're up to speed before your first meeting.
Access the full meeting history, past resolutions and outstanding action register the moment you're added as a director — no lengthy briefing document required.
Start Free Trial 30 days free · No credit card requiredSub-Committees and Working Groups
Below the main board, organisations often form sub-committees or working groups — finance committee, fundraising committee, events committee — to address specific areas in more depth than the full board can. These are typically formed by the board and staffed by a mix of board members and co-opted non-directors with relevant expertise.
Sub-committee membership is usually by invitation or expression of interest, with the board maintaining oversight of who serves and what authority is delegated. Each sub-committee should have documented terms of reference, its own meeting process, and minutes that feed into the full board’s governance record.
Whether you’re joining a public company’s board, a not-for-profit committee, or a sub-committee of your local sports club, the question to ask before you accept is not just “what do they need from me?” but “what do they need to provide me so I can do the job properly?” The governance systems, the access to records, the quality of meeting preparation — these determine whether a board member can actually contribute, regardless of how capable they are.